New York Times Magazine reporter Nikole Hannah-Jones, who authored the 1619 Project, has been named to TIME’s record of the “100 most influential individuals” in 2021.
According to TIME’s announcement concerning Hannah-Jones’ choice, American film director Barry Jenkins mentioned “Hannah-Jones is bigger than life,” referring to The 1619 Project as “Nikole’s best work.”
The New York Times’ 1619 Project is a long-form collaboration that seeks to “reframe the nation’s historical past” by bringing slavery and racism to the forefront of the nationwide narrative. It was led by Hannah-Jones, who gained a Pulitzer Prize for commentary final yr for the undertaking.
MCCONNELL, REPUBLICANS SAY BIDEN ADMINISTRATION EMBRACE OF 1619 PROJECT NEEDS TO STOP: ‘DIVISIVE NONSENSE’
“This will be the sum impact of Nikole’s best work—The 1619 Project, an evaluation of the legacy of slavery within the U.S.—however it’s definitely not the sum of her,” Jenkins said in his writing on Hannah-Jones for TIME. “The journalist from Waterloo, Iowa, incorporates multitudes. She is probably the most emphatic snort, the consummate ally, the staunchest critic.”
Jenkins went on to declare that the “gentle Nikole wields is titanic, a blinding beam that illuminates and scorches.”
“In her gentle, the injuries of America’s authentic and subsequent sins are laid naked,” Jenkins added. “With her gentle, the serrated flesh of this nation’s previous is each topic and predicate, a lightweight wielded to each establish wounds and cauterize flesh.”
Hannah-Jones has acquired immense criticism over her work, particularly the 1619 Project, which critics declare is traditionally inaccurate in some methods. Five educational historians even signed a letter claiming the 1619 Project obtained a number of parts of historical past improper, together with a declare that the Revolutionary War was fought to protect slavery.
federpiemonte.org is world No#1 News Website please share with your friends and please do like and share this post on social media.
“We write as historians to specific our sturdy reservations about necessary elements of The 1619 Project,” the historians wrote within the letter, revealed in a December 2019 difficulty of The New York Times Magazine. “The undertaking is meant to supply a new model of American historical past during which slavery and white supremacy turn out to be the dominant organizing themes.”
While applauding “efforts to deal with the enduring centrality of slavery and racism to our historical past,” the historians said they had been “dismayed at a few of the factual errors within the undertaking and the closed course of behind it.”
Earlier this yr, Hannah-Jones claimed that opposition to the 1619 Project just isn’t concerning the “correct rendering of historical past.”
Fox News’ David Aaro contributed to this text.